I consider myself a scientist.
Certainly not by occupation but, rather, vocation. I understand the scientific method and am comfortable reading peer-reviewed research, particularly in the world of medicine. And while I would certainly not claim to have the depth of knowledge of a medical doctor or other PhDs, my decades of owning businesses that worked closely with such individuals, as well as my personal fascination and interest in all things science, have given me a good understanding of how to view the physical world around us.
Because I also understand the world of business and marketing I have, perhaps, an uncommon advantage when looking at the subject of climate change. I have some insight into motivations and human nature that perhaps allows me to know this is more than just about science?
Let me sum up my beliefs regarding Climate Change…
Climate change is real; the climate is constantly changing… always has, always will. The activities of man certainly contribute to climate change; it is said the flapping of a butterfly’s wings in China is able to cause a hurricane in the Caribbean… Everything is connected and everything has an effect. How much is man affecting the change in climate? No one knows, but probably not very much.
What I just stated are actual facts. Pretty much everything else you hear on either side of the issue that claims to be authoritative is simply propaganda.
How the Game Is Played
The argument for man-made climate change is based on scientific models. All the ‘evidence’ you hear discussed in the Ruling Class Media is either the data that goes into the models or the predictions that come out of the models. Data can be manipulated and scientific models are nothing other than predictions.
The scientific world is divided up into the hard sciences and the soft sciences (I know, I’m oversimplifying… but, it works for this). The hard sciences (physics, mathematics, etc.) deal with scientific models that produce results that can be predicted and consistently duplicated by others. Hard science deals with verifiable outcomes we call proofs. The soft sciences deal with scientific models that predict results that cannot be confirmed or consistently duplicated. Climate scientists fall firmly into this category. So does polling science.
Every election cycle polling companies use scientific algorithms and formulas to predict the outcome of elections. They poll population segments for data, plug it into their model, and make a prediction. This is valid science, but it is soft science.
And it is often wrong.
And it is sometimes right, which shows that polling science can be useful. Climate science models, on the other hand, are almost never right. This is certainly because climate science is much more complicated. Whereas pollsters only need to collect data from a few hundred to a few thousand individuals, climate scientists need millions of points of data (things like air and water temperatures, wind velocities, solar radiation, ocean currents, etc. - all at thousands of locations and geographies - and all at various times of the day and year). It is complicated further by the fact that these data sets are worthless unless the exact same information is available for every year going back as long as possible.
This is problematic, at best. Recently, the NOAA (National Oceanic Atmospheric Association) had to throw out a decade’s worth of surface temperature readings when they realized the automated weather stations surrounded by pavement gave differing readings from those surrounded by grass. (To my knowledge, however, the alarming studies based on this erroneous data were never retracted.)
It is all but impossible to get accurate data, let alone get accurate predictions. Yet we have been teaching our children and believing Ruling Class Politicians when they say it is settled science. Why?
Because there is an agenda. Actually, there are a lot of agendas. We should look at behavior, not rhetoric. One behavior that is extremely concerning is the avalanche of false and altered data being plugged into the models in the first place. Also concerning are the plethora of models that do not include or disproportionately discount factors such as ocean currents and solar storms. These factors, especially solar storms (sunspots), are known to have a significant impact on global temperature. And unbelievably, many so-called climate scientists refuse to even acknowledge the clear data showing a 20-year pause in the rise of global temperatures (because their models don’t predict it).
All of this out-of-character seriously unprofessional behavior by a significant minority of the scientific community leads us to conclude there are hidden forces and hidden agendas at play. This is a reasonable conclusion based on observation.
But what are the agendas?
I think it is easier to understand why Ruling Class Politicians, Ruling Class Media, and Ruling Class Oligarchs would want to push the idea of man-made climate change, so we’ll address that last. What’s seemingly harder to explain is why any type of scientist, hard or soft, would falsify data, leave out data, and/or totally abandon the scientific method? It’s harder to understand, that is until we remember Galileo.
In 1633, the now famous astronomer Galileo Galilei was convicted of heresy. His published works were prohibited and he spent the rest of his life confined to house arrest. His crime? Suggesting that the earth was not the center of the universe; instead, suggesting that the earth actually rotated around the sun.
Galileo was not the first nor the last scientist to be persecuted by the governing authority. Even Albert Einstein suffered persecution at the hands of the German government and suffered the loss of all titles and privileges there.
We must remember that scientists are typically of the intelligentsia. And the intelligentsia survives now, as it did in Galileo’s time, at the suffrage of the Ruling Class.
There has always been pressure on scientists to validate existing modes of thought, be they theological or ideological. Historically, a fair number of scientists have been of high character and resisted; many have not. As will become obvious, there has perhaps never been a time in human history when more pressure has been placed upon scientists to validate a preconceived outcome. Anthropogenic Climate Change itself has become a religion. Grant money, social acceptance, the ability to publish, and even the opportunity to make a living are at stake for the vast majority of legitimate scientists who wish to study the Earth’s climate.
Make no mistake, there are many fanatical believers when it comes to anthropogenic climate change. You can find them in all of the self-appointed Ruling Classes, but especially the Ruling Class Media and Ruling Class Suck-ups. Conversely, while there are exceptions, by observing the behavior of the Ruling Class Oligarchy I have come to believe most are not true believers. Or, maybe more accurately, they could care less…
The religion of climate change is being used as a hammer to break down the sovereignty of the United States of America and other Western nations. It is the perfect excuse for globalists to claim that no one country should be allowed to be more industrious, ambitious, and therefore richer than other countries. International agreements like the Paris Climate Accords do not restrict carbon emissions from all countries (as most people think). It only proposes restricting them for advanced Western countries – primarily the United States. The biggest polluters, countries like China, Russia, and almost the entire Third World are free to actually increase their carbon emissions for a large number of years in order to give them the chance to industrially catch up with the United States. At which point (theoretically), and over a decade in the future, they would start reducing their own emissions.
The Paris Climate Accords have nothing to do with climate change or benefiting the planet; it has everything to do with the globalist goal of leveling the international playing field, removing American sovereignty, and redistributing the industrial and technological wealth of the world.
The Paris Climate Accords were intended to be the culmination and pinnacle achievement of the entire Climate Change movement. For those of us that study behavior, however, it serves as a microcosm exposing the true agenda behind the movement.
If the Ruling Class were serious about clean sources of energy, we would be discussing this: “Alabama Sen. Tommy Tuberville (R) is leading the push for an energy-independent America through reactors using thorium, a natural resource found in abundance domestically that produces both clean and safe energy. He called for an end to the destruction of the country’s stockpile and warned against Chinese progress in the technology that was given to them, as well as unrealistic “green” ambitions of Democrats, while highlighting the “huge national security risk” of energy dependency.” LEARN MORE
I have compassion for the tens of millions of people around the globe that have been duped into supporting this hidden agenda under what are certainly false pretenses. However, it does not change the fact that this movement is a weapon being used against us. We must resist it. We must stand up to it with compassion but firm resolve. I will always be open to valid new evidence about the climate and this planet we live on (I was a conservationist before anyone knew what an environmentalist was). But at this point in time, there is more valid reason to worry about an asteroid impacting the planet than there is to worry about man affecting global temperatures.
And all of those risks pale in comparison to the risk of global communism (Globalism).
StressFreeBill
For those serious about real sources of
Friendly reminder… you can leave comments, like, and share from the bottom of the page (and we hope you will). The only way our readership grows is through you – Thank You…
Create your profile
Only paid subscribers can comment on this post
Check your email
For your security, we need to re-authenticate you.
Click the link we sent to , or click here to sign in.